Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Duffy

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 31, 1974No. EBD 74-100Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MURRAY, District Judge.

Barnes and Preziosi (Barnes) seek subpoenas under 35 U.S.C. § 24 for the attendance of witnesses to testify before an officer authorized to take depositions, and for the production of documents, to be used in a contested case pending in the United States Patent Office before the Board of Patent Interferences (Board). Duffy, also a party to the case pending before the Board, seeks orders from this court to quash the subpoenas duces tecum and for a protective order to prevent the taking of testimony from the persons named in the subpeonas. After hearing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frilette v. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Frilette v. KimberlinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
  4. Nachtman v. ToulminDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API