Legal Opinion

Nachtman v. Toulmin

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 27, 1961No. 2548PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEINMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendants, Harry A. Toulmin, Jr. and The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio, to quash summons and on the motions of defendants, Harry A. Toulmin, Jr., and The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio, to dismiss the complaint.

The background of this matter is as follows:

*368On October 3, 1955, the United States Patent Office established an interference with respect to plaintiff’s patent No. 2,-699,415 and an application of defendant, Toulmin, Serial No. 294,774. Said interference was subsequently divided into a number…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Westinghouse v. HienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API