Nachtman v. Toulmin
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
WEINMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendants, Harry A. Toulmin, Jr. and The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio, to quash summons and on the motions of defendants, Harry A. Toulmin, Jr., and The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio, to dismiss the complaint.
The background of this matter is as follows:
*368On October 3, 1955, the United States Patent Office established an interference with respect to plaintiff’s patent No. 2,-699,415 and an application of defendant, Toulmin, Serial No. 294,774. Said interference was subsequently divided into a number…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Westinghouse v. HienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barnes v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1974