Legal Opinion

Ringling v. Ringling

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 19, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us on motion to dis'miss an appeal on the ground that the same is frivolous. The appeal is from an order overruling and denying motion to quash constructive service.

The affidavit for publication of constructive service was in the following language, to-wit:

“In the Circuit Court of the Twenty-Seventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, in and for Sarasota County. In Chancery.
“John Ringling, Plaintiff, v. Emily Ringling, Defendant:
“Divorce
“Affidavit for Constructive Service
“State of Florida,
“County of Sarasota.

• “Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared John…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. North v. Ringling Ringling v. NorthSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. West Flagler Associates, Ltd. v. Department of Business & Professional RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Howard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  5. Tobin v. Tobin, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API