Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Armstrong v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 28, 1985No. Nos. 83SC59, 83SC74Published

1Concurrence

QUINN, Justice,

specially concurring:

I specially concur in the judgment reversing the convictions of both defendants on the basis that they were denied their constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. U.S. Const. amends. VI & XIV; Colo. Const. art. II, § 16. I do not read Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980), however, as requiring a defendant who raised no objection to trial counsel’s multiple representation to demonstrate not only that there was an actual conflict of interest at trial but also that the lawyer’s simultaneous representation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API