Legal Opinion

In Re Appropriation of Easement for Highway Purposes Over Property of Moores Lime Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1958No. 548PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.

The Director of Highways appeals on questions of law from a judgment entered upon a verdict fixing the value of land taken and damages to residue on account of the construction and improvement of U. S. Route 40. Two errors are assigned.

The property taken consists of 6.99 acres, part of a tract referred to as 46.08 acres underlaid with dolomite-bearing rock which was being quarried and processed by the owner, Moores Lime Company, the appellee herein.

The resolution and finding of the Director of Highways, filed in accordance with Section 5519.01, Revised Code, was that the value of the property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District v. FunkOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fleisch v. First American BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. In Re Appropriation of EasementsOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Southern Railway Company v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. In Re AppropriationOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Fleisch v. First American BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API