Ajala v. Tom
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Mustafa-El Ajala, a Wisconsin prisoner, alleges in this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that two correctional officers violated the Eighth Amendment by refusing to loosen painfully tight handcuffs for several hours, causing lasting damage and pain. The district court granted summary judgment for the Defendants on the ground of qualified immunity. We vacate and remand for further proceedings.
We recount the facts in the light most favorable to Ajala, the non-moving party. See Carson v. ALL Erection & Crane Rental Corp., 811 F.3d 993, 994 (7th Cir. 2016). Late one night in February 2007,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Pavey v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boston v. EutseyDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2020
- CURRY v. NORTONDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024
- Changamu v. LambDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Durley v. JeanpierreDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Gray v. FisherDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.