Rachel v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
The trial of this matter is set to commence on Tuesday, April 4, 1995. Presently pending before the Court are two motions in limine filed by the defendant. Having received and reviewed those motions, together with Plaintiffs oppositions thereto, the Court has reached the conclusions delineated in the following opinion and order.
Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. John Burke
In its first motion in limine, Defendant asks the Court to exclude the testimony of Plaintiffs expert economist, Dr. John Burke. Defendant complains that Dr. Burke’s opinion concerning…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Priscilla G. Boxberger, Personal Representative of the Estate of Kenneth R. Boxberger, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Richard E. Madore v. Ingram Tank Ships, Inc. v. Samson Ocean Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Florence Metcalfe, Administratrix of the Estate of John E. Metcalfe, Deceased v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ramsey v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Edwards v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Williams v. BNSF Railway CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Edwards v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.