Legal Opinion
Emiabata v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 17, 2017No. 17-447Published
1Opinion of the Court
t,^' t j,q t ;'Ef.:;riE;-th lJntbt @nift! $ltstts @ourt of fe[eru[ @lsimg No. 17-447C FILED (Filed November 11, 2017) NoV 17 20[ PHILIP EMIABATA, d/b/A #3;8o",u3t?^l' PHILEMA BROTHERS, Contract; Wrongful Termination for Plaintiff, Default Claim; No Jurisdiction Over Breach and Tort Claims; Conversion of RCFC 12(bX6) Motion to RCFC 56 Motion. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Philip Emiabata, Pflugerville, TX, pro se. Emma E. Bond,r Trial Attorney, with whom were Chad A. Rcadler, Acting Assistant Attomey General, Robert E. Kirschman. Jr., Director, Brian A. Mizoguchi, Assistant Directoi,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Daniel A. Lindsay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.