Legal Opinion

Kierman Realty Co. of Randolph, Inc. v. Michetti

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 2, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRider, J.

This is a civil action sounding in contract for the recovery of a commission alleged to be due to the plaintiff real estate broker. Under Count I, recovery is sought in the amount of $4,193.00 pursuant to a written purchase and sale agreement. Count II is in quantum meruit. In answer to Count I, the defendants (sellers) allege that under the written agreement they are not liable for any broker’s commission since the payment of any commission was conditioned upon the passing of title. In answer to Count II, the defendants deny that the plaintiff is entitled to recover in quantum meruit.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Sherman v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Tristram's Landing, Inc. v. WaitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Kennedy Bros. v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Barttro v. Watertown Square Theatre, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keerd v. UsenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Vahedi v. TalbotMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API