Legal Opinion

Savage v. Munn

Oregon Tax Court

Decided March 13, 1992No. TC 3075PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Judge.

This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs are property owners seeking a declaratory judgment under ORS chapter 28 regarding Article XI, section 11b(4), of the Oregon Constitution. Plaintiffs and defendants have stipulated the facts. Intervenors have not joined in that stipulation but also have not objected or sought to introduce additional evidence.

In their amended complaint, plaintiffs claim Article XI, section 11b(4), violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Savage v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API