Legal Opinion
Sperry v. Maki
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 23, 1987No. 7724-1-IIIPublished
1Opinion of the Court
48 Wn. App. 599 (1987)
740 P.2d 342
JEAN SPERRY, ET AL, Respondents,
v.
DOUG MAKI, ET AL, Defendants, ROCKY MOUNTAIN FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, INC., Appellant.
No. 7724-1-III.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
July 23, 1987.
Neil S. Gladson, for appellant.
Ronald L. Skala, Mark A. Kunkler, and Weeks, Dietzen & Skala, for respondents.
MUNSON, J.
Rocky Mountain Fire and Casualty Company appeals a summary judgment in favor of its insureds, Jean and Donald Sperry. The Superior Court held coverage existed under the underinsured motorist provision of the Sperrys' policy for damages…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.