Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1982No. 8118DC1237Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

We hold it was error not to dismiss the action to enforce the separation agreement. A judgment by confession had been entered against the defendant pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 68.1. This gave the plaintiff a judgment on all issues raised in the complaint. See Cromer v. Cromer, 49 N.C. App. 403, 271 S.E. 2d 541 (1980), rev’d on other grounds, 303 N.C. 307, 278 S.E. 2d 518 (1981) and Whitehead v. Whitehead, 13 N.C. App. 393, 185 S.E. 2d 706 (1972). When the relief sought in an action has been granted, the action should be dismissed. See In re Peoples, 296 N.C. 109, 250 S.E. 2d 890…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Winborne v. WinborneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Crew v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API