Seemiller v. Amato
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County
1Opinion of the Court
NANOVIC, P.J.,
“Before a state may take property and sell it for unpaid taxes, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires the government to provide the owner ‘notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.’ ” So begins the decision by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. Flowers, 547 U.S. 220, 126 S.Ct. 1708, 1712, 164 L.Ed.2d 415 (2006) (quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950)). It is also, as we shall see, the answer to the issue presented by the Bennett Family Trust in its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- American Land Co. v. ZeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Tracy v. County of Chester, Tax Claim BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.