Legal Opinion

Armstrong Tire and Rubber Company v. Shearer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1956No. 12952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of H. J. Shearer and Jack Davis, for personal injuries they sustained when the automobile in which they were riding collided with the automobile driven by James A. Shults, an employee of Armstrong Tire and Rubber Company. Shearer and Davis, at the time of the collision, were passengers and guests in a Ford automobile driven by T. G. Brown, who is not a party to the suit. The collision occurred after dark. Davis was in the front seat to the right of the driver and Shearer was in the back seat, behind the driver. Brown was driving in a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. World Oil Co. v. HicksTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Edmiston v. Texas & N. O. R.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  4. Edmiston v. Texas & New Orleans RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. The Schuhmacher Co. v. ShooterTexas Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Leonard & Harral Packing Co. v. HahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Howard v. American Paper Stock Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Howard v. American Paper Stock Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API