Legal Opinion

Hong-Yee Chiu v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 2, 1984No. 336-79CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YANNELLO, Judge.

Currently before this court is plaintiff’s Application for Fees and Expenses, as amended, and defendant’s opposition thereto. The facts are not in dispute and are summarized briefly below. They present questions of law, including the applicability of the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1982), and the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 1101, 5596, 7701, and 7703, as amended by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub.L. 95-454, §§ 205, 702, 92 Stat. 1111, 1139 (1978).

Facts

Plaintiff was employed as a space scientist (GS-14 and 15) with the National…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dr. Bhartur N. Premachandra v. Dr. Murray G. Mitts, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Nibali v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Lukas E. Hoska, III v. United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. Mary K. Olsen v. Department of Commerce, Census BureauCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Kellus v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Hong-Yee Chiu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. Riley v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API