Legal Opinion

United States v. Quigley

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 25, 1992No. 66,848; CM 9002706PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge:

Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a general court-martial composed of officers of committing indecent acts on a child, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 3 months, total *346forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sentence, and the Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence without opinion. We granted review on the following issues:

I

WHETHER APPELLANT WAS PREJUDICED BY…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. ArruzaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. EdensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. WilliamsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. SirokyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. QuigleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. Sergeant TODD R. MARCHESANOArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  5. United States v. HawkinsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API