Legal Opinion

United States v. Quigley

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 17, 1994No. 66,848; CMR No. 9002706PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Chief Judge:

During September and October 1990, appellant was tried by officer members in a *65general court-martial at Frankfurt and Butzbach, Germany. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of committing an indecent act with another, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 3 months, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. On December 13, 1990, the convening authority approved the sentence. On May 8, 1991, the Court of Military Review affirmed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. EdensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. BinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. SirokyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. HughesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  5. United States v. UretaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API