Legal Opinion

Smith v. Throckmartin

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1995No. 94-21PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question here is the existence of a genuine issue of material fact with respect to culpable negligence on the part of a “co-employee” which would prevent summary judgment in favor of the defendant. Jeffrey L. Smith and Elaine D.R. Smith (Smiths) sued Paul Throckmartin (Throckmartin), a supervisory co-employee, seeking recovery for personal injuries and loss of consortium, contending Throckmartin was culpably negligent. The district court ruled the Smiths had failed to demonstrate Throckmartin intentionally and unreasonably acted in disregard of a known or obvious risk in a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stephenson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Roybal v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Albrecht v. Zwaanshoek Holding en Financiering, B.V.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hermreck v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Krier v. Safeway Stores 46, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hannifan v. American National Bank of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Woodard v. Cook Ford Sales, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Loredo Ex Rel. Loredo v. Solvay America, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API