Legal Opinion

Matthews v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1999No. 91A02-9810-CR-836PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Virgil Matthews appeals his conviction by jury for rape and criminal deviate conduct, both class B felonies.

We reverse.

ISSUE

Whether Matthews was denied his constitutional due process rights when the jury was instructed that “[t]he law presumes that an individual intends the consequences of his act.”

FACTS

Matthews was charged with the rape of and engaging in criminal deviate conduct with his mentally disabled thirty year-old stepdaughter, Claire Bailey. Specifically, the State charged that during a two year period, Matthews “did knowingly and/or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cuto v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Chris D. Hawkins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Lampkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Billy Brantley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Billy Brantley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API