Legal Opinion · Dissent

Billy Brantley v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 49A04-1606-CR-1401Published

1DissentBailey, Judge

I agree with the majority that the State did not properly obtain its conviction. Article 1, Section 19 of the Indiana Constitution protects the province of the jury in criminal trials, allocating to the jury the right to determine the law and the facts. Keller v. State, 47 N.E.3d 1205, 1208 (Ind. 2016). Here, the province of the jury was invaded by a fundamentally erroneous instruction attempting to relieve the State of its burden of proof. However, unlike the majority, I believe that retrial is permissi*405ble, in light of the evidence of sudden heat. Where a burden-shifting instruction has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Dearman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Moala v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API