Russell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
DOUGLAS, Judge.
On original submission we affirmed in a per curiam opinion the order revoking appellant’s probation, overruling his sole contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when he was originally convicted and placed on probation.
On rehearing he contends that the evidence was insufficient at the revocation hearing to show that he violated the condition of probation to commit no offense against the laws of this State. He also contends that because he was found not guilty under an indictment his probation could not be revoked…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scamardo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Ex Parte ShiversCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Barrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Lloyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.