Legal Opinion

Construction Services of Samoa, Inc. v. Bank of Hawaii

High Court of American Samoa

Decided January 28, 2004No. CA No. 21-02Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant Bank of Hawaii (“BOH”) moves, pursuant to T.C.R.C.P. 56, for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summaiy judgment on the complaint of Plaintiffs Construction Services of Samoa, Inc. (“CSS”), Mora Mane (“Moru”) and Sallie Mane (“Sallie”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”).1 For the reasons stated below, we grant in part BOH’s motion for partial summaiy judgment.

BOH moves for summaiy judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment with respect to counts one through five and nine of Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hamilton v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Collums Ex Rel. Collums v. UNION PLANT.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2002
  4. Masotti v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Masotti v. Bristol Savings BankConnecticut Superior Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API