Barrow v. ATCO Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
The appellant-defendant John Barrow brings this interlocutory appeal. The two issues are stated as:
1. Whether the trial court erred in finding that Georgia law should apply to the substantive rights of the parties to this cause; and,
2. Whether the trial court erred in granting ATCO's motion to amend complaint by interlineation.
We affirm.
The underlying facts show that Barrow owned and operated a chemical business and called upon customers in southern Indiana. In mid 1986 Barrow sent proposals to several large chemical companies seeking to sell his business and to employ him as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hubbard Manufacturing Co. v. GreesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Sink & Edwards, Inc. v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Utopia Coach Corp. v. WeatherwaxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Indiana Department of Public Welfare v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Carl Subler Trucking, Inc. v. SplittorffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by14 opinions
- R.E. Wood, Jr. And Julie Wood v. Mid-Valley IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Allen v. Great American Reserve Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Cap Gemini America, Inc. v. JuddIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Great West Casualty Co. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Carter v. AllenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.