Legal Opinion

Custard v. City of South Bend

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1981No. 3-1080A333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.

This ease arises from the passage of an annexation ordinance by the City of South Bend. In this particular appeal, Fred N. Davis, one of the original remonstrators, raises the following issues:(1) whether the trial court erred in conducting a hearing on the sufficiency of the remonstrance when Davis had not received notice of the hearing and was not represented by counsel;(2) whether the trial court erred in conducting a hearing on the sufficiency of the remonstrance over objection of the remonstrators and in overruling the remonstrators’ motions for a continuance;(3)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Annexation to City of Mishawaka v. MinneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. PETERCHEFF v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Froberg v. Northern Indiana Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. In RE ANNEXATION ETC. v. City of AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Bata Shoe Co. v. City of SalemIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barr v. Sun Exploration Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Johnson v. WellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Ryan Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cumberland, Indiana, City of Indianapolis, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API