PETERCHEFF v. City of Indianapolis
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandis, J.
This action concerns the sufficiency of a remonstrance against an annexation ordinance of the City of Indianapolis. The procedure for re*492monstrating against annexation ordinances is provided by Burns’ §48-702 (1961 Cum. Supp.), viz.:
“Whenever territory is annexed to a city whether by general ordinance defining the city boundaries, or by special ordinance for the purpose of annexing territory, cm appeal may be taken from such annexation by either a majority of the owners of land in the territory or by the owners of more than seventy-five [75] per cent in assessed valuation of the real estate in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hord ex rel. Stanley v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Black v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Pennsylvania Co. v. McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Parker v. Seward School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Jones v. NayIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by13 opinions
- Annexation to City of Mishawaka v. MinneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Engle v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hooten v. AltIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Herdt v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Larry and Sally Arnold v. City of Terre HauteIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.