Mintz & Gold LLP v. Daibes
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendant-appellant Fred A. Daibes appeals the district court’s imposition of sanctions in the amount of $10,000 on Daibes’ counsel, Richard J. Abrahamsen. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and the issues on appeal.
We review orders imposing Rule 11 sanctions for abuse of discretion. See Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 409, 110 S.Ct. 2447, 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990); Storey v. Cello Holdings, L.L.C., 347 F.3d 370, 387 (2d Cir.2003). Underlying factual findings are reviewed for clear error. Friends of Animals Inc. v. U.S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- LAWRENCE STOREY, — v. CELLO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., CELLO MUSIC AND FILM SYSTEMS, INC., — HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP AND ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Schlaifer Nance & Co. v. Estate of WarholCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hudson Private LP v. Creative Wealth Media Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Jeffrey S. Pittman, Erin E. Mack, and C.J.M., an infant by her proposed Guardian ad Litem Jeffrey S. Pittman v. Pandora Media, LLC, Ditto Ltd (trading as Ditto Music), and Sirius XM Holdings Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Labombard v. HarrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Nocelli v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- O'Rear v. DiazDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.