State Banking & Trust Co. v. Taylor
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha Count)’, Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by the State Banking & Trust Company against F. W. Taylor. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha Count)’, Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by the State Banking & Trust Company against F. W. Taylor. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. When the highest judicial authority authorized to pass on the construction of the Constitution or statute of a country have passed upon and construed the same, the meaning as given, becomes as much a part of such law as though it had originally been written therein. 'Where parties have acted upon such law, so interpreted, their rights will be protected, regardless of any isubsequent change of position by the…
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, P. J.
The sole question before us upon this appeal is whether the rights of the respondent Taylor, as pur*579chaser under an attachment of certain shares of corporate stock, are superior to those of plaintiff, a. pledgee of such stock; the pledgor being the debtor against whom the attachment issued. The cause was tried to the circuit court without a jury, and such court made findings of fact. No question is raised as to the correctness of such findings, but it is the contention of the appellant that such findings do not support the conclusions and judgment of the trial court, >by which judgment said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Baldwin v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Lipscomb's Adm'r v. CondonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Robinson v. . National Bank of New BerneNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Thurber v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ward v. Dakota Telephone & Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Shugart v. MaytagSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Gray Construction Co. v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926