Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hernandez v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2021No. 20AP-163PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Hernandez v. Indus. Comm.,

2021-Ohio-3217.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Martin Hernandez, : Relator, : v. : No. 20AP-163 Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Respondents. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on September 16, 2021 Schiavoni, Schiavoni, Bush & Muldowney, and Shawn Muldowney, for relator. Dave Yost, Attorney General, and Andrew J. Alatis, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. IN MANDAMUS MENTEL, J. {¶ 1} Relator, Martin Hernandez, brought this original action seeking a writ of mandamus ordering…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Lewis v. Diamond Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Arline v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. State ex rel. McCormack v. Ashtabula Cty. Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API