Legal Opinion

Usf&g v. Pierce Waste Oil Service

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 15, 1992No. N90-137-C-7PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

806 F.Supp. 832 (1992)

UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Plaintiff,

v.

PIERCE WASTE OIL SERVICE, INC., et al., Defendants.

No. N90-137-C-7.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, N.D.

September 15, 1992.

Brown & James, Jeffrey L. Cramer, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Wolfson & Papushkewych, Gerri Papushkewych, Springfield, Ill., for defendants.

Jamie Kathryn Lansford, Kansas City, Mo., for Mexico Feed and Seed.

David E. Morgans, Mary A. Sliwinski, Chicago, Ill., Preston E. Roskin, Kenneth A. Leeds, Clayton, Mo., for defendant National Indem. Co.

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

HAMILTON, District…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Mexico Feed and Seed Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
  4. National Indemnity Co. v. Pierce Waste Oil Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
  5. American States Ins. v. Mexico Feed & Seed Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Walden Resources, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
  2. Wiese v. Legend Air Suspensions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2012
  3. Kumar Kammarayil v. Sterling Operations, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API