Legal Opinion
Kumar Kammarayil v. Sterling Operations, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 31, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2015-1699Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI AJEESH KUMAR KAMMARAYIL, et al., Civil Action No. 15-1699 (BAH) Plaintiffs, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell v. STERLING OPERATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The two relators, Gopalakrishna Pillai Ajeesh Kumar Kammarayil and Mohammed Azad Shabbir, waited three years, from October 2015 to November 2018, for the government to decide whether to intervene in this qui tam matter brought pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1). Despite…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Center for National Security Studies v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.