Legal Opinion
Baptiste v. Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 6, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-2566Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMBER BAPTISTE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-02566 (UNA) SEQUOIA CAPITAL OPERATIONS, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Amber Baptiste’s pro se Complaint, ECF No. 1, and Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Baptiste’s IFP Application and dismiss the case with prejudice. Baptiste, a resident of California, sues Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC, although she appears to sue numerous other Defendants who…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Brown v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.