Legal Opinion

Laury v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 1, 1969PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice.

On this appeal from robbery convictions, it is contended that admission of statements obtained from the defendants by police, and identification of the defendants by the victim, fatally tainted the convictions. We disagree.

I

As to the statements: At the scene of the street-corner robbery, and within minutes thereafter, the police found the defendants there and questioned them without the usual Miranda warnings. * Immediately thereafter, the defendants were taken to the police station where they were promptly questioned again, this time with the required Miranda warnings.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. People v. HorneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. State v. ReddickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Garden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API