Legal Opinion

Dano v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 5, 1937No. 6384PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In the court below Nick Dano was tried, convicted, and sentenced on an indictment charging him with certain violations of Joint Resolution No. 373, section 1162a, .title 26 U.S.C.A., and Regulation 17 of the Bureau of Internal Revenue. , Thereupon he took this appeal from an order of the court denying his motio.n in arrest of judgment, and the question involved is the constitutionality of such legislation and regulation. That question was decided in an opinion of the judge below reported in (D.C.) 20 F.Supp. 458.

After consideration had, we affirm the court’s action, adopting its opinion as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. DanoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Huard-Steinheiser, Inc. v. George A. Henry, Supervisor in Charge, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax UnitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. Di Santo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  3. United States v. TishmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  4. Ballard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  5. Huard-Steinheiser, Inc. v. George A. Henry, Supervisor in Charge, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax UnitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API