Legal Opinion

Di Santo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1937No. 7642PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was tried, convicted, and sentenced upon three counts of an indictment, each charging him with a willful failure to make a report to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of "brown sugar” alleged to have been sold by him. The statute, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1162a provides that “every person disposing of any -substance of the character used in the manufacture of distilled spirits shall, when required by the Commissioner, render a correct return in such form and manner as the Commissioner, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, may by rules and regulations…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. Shreveport Grain & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. James Everard's Breweries v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Rodgers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Huard-Steinheiser, Inc. v. George A. Henry, Supervisor in Charge, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax UnitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  4. O'NEAL v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  5. Bowles v. MisleDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API