Keum v. Virgin America Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART VIRGIN’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On February 25, 2011, the Court heard argument on defendant Virgin America’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendant’s motion. If plaintiff wishes to amend the complaint, the amended complaint must be filed no later than March 18, 2011. As requested by the parties, the case management conference scheduled for March 4, 2011 is rescheduled for March 18,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Warner v. Tinder Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- (PS) Rigor v. CSUSDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Adelene Sanders v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Alapati v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Ali v. American Airlines Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.