Legal Opinion
United States v. Tsarnaev
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 17, 2014No. Criminal No. 13-10200-GAOPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
O’TOOLE, District Judge.
The defendant has moved to suppress the fruits of physical and digital searches that took place between April 19, 2013 and July 26, 2013. The government opposes the motions, and the defendant has filed a reply brief. The defendant has requested an evidentiary hearing, but as set forth below, a hearing is not necessary to resolve the present motions.
I. Background
A. Physical Searches
On April 19, 2013, after the defendant’s brother, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, had been identified after his death through fingerprint comparisons, federal agents obtained and executed…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Moore-BushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. ManafortDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- United States v. ScanzaniDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- United States of America v. Valentin Delo Perez SotoDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017