Legal Opinion

Western National Bank v. W. C. Peacock & Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1906PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal eeom Cibcuit Judge, Fiest Oiecuxt.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

This is an action by the payee against the acceptor of a bill of exchange for $1148.56. The bill was drawn by the Hilbert. Mercantile Co. at San Francisco November 4, 1905, payable to the plaintiff, a national bank of San Francisco, and indorsed' accepted by the defendant, a Hawaiian corporation, December 23, 1905. It was payable six months after date and, default having been made in payment, this action was begun July 21,, *1621906. Tlie defendant filed an answer of general denial with notice of intention to rely on want of consideration, and an. affidavit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. GearHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Arpin v. OwensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Walker v. PetersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. F. E. Davis & Co. v. Illinois-Pacific Glass Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Marumi v. BonnellHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In re the Contempt of Goo Wan HoyHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hansen v. Ah Bun LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Humburg v. Wong KwaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API