Helmerich-Payne, Inc. v. Debus

On Motion for Rehearing.

We have carefully reviewed appellee’s motion for a rehearing and see no reason why we should change our conclusions in this case.

Appellee testified that he went to the gap made in his south fence at a time which was very shortly after the defendant’s employees made the gap.

He said that the cattle escaping through that gap would go into Chamberlain’s pasture, which joins him on the south. He said that Chamberlain told him he drove up certain livestock belonging to appellee, and ap-pellee described them as: “2 head of cattle, 2 mares, 2 mules and 1 jack.” He then…