Legal Opinion

State v. Splett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1923No. 23,329Published

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendants were convicted of tbe offense defined by section 8715, G. S. 1913, and appeal from tbe order denying a new trial.

Tbe indictment charged defendants with receiving part of tbeir support from Mazine Dauer, engaged in prostitution, in that they received from ber about $100 between September 13, 1921, and November 4 following, well knowing that sbe earned said money by prostitution.

Tbe sufficiency of tbe evidence is challenged. Maxine testified that, in tbe early part of September, 1921, sbe took a room from defendants, who were conducting a rooming bouse in Mankato, Minnesota, under an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CantienySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. State v. SheaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Minnesota & Dakota Cattle Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Miller v. LayneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API