Legal Opinion

State v. . Burno

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Whcdbee, Jat January Term, 1912, of Rich-MOND. Tbe defendant was convicted upon tbe charge of unlawfully selling cocaine to Cora McKeithan, and appealed from tbe judgment pronounced upon tbe verdict. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice All&n.

1Opinion of the CourtAlleN, J.

No objection is taken to tbe bill of indictment, and there is no contention that the evidence was not sufficient to justify the verdict.

All of the evidence introduced at the trial is not sent up as a part of the case on appeal, but it appears that C. B. Wright was the principal witness for the State, and he testified, among other things, as follows: “I saw Burno give the McKeithan woman a package, and saw her give him some money and he gave her back change; I was looking through the window; that after the woman had come from out of the house, I arrested her and found on her person a package…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MuseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. . MacKlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API