Legal Opinion · Dissent

London Square Village v. OKLAHOMA CTY. EQUALIZATION AND EXCISE BD.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 1976No. 48596Published

1DissentDoolin, Justice

I dissent.

This court’s opinion enunciates a principle that if a low income person helps himself in any small manner, assistance given to him is not for a charitable purpose. Because a portion of a person’s income is paid as rent does not mean he is not in need of or may not be a recipient of “charity.” As for example various church or lodge sponsored organizations and hospitals receive non-taxable charitable status even though many of the persons served in such institutions are full or part paying patients or guests.

National Society of the Volunteers of America is a charitable and religious…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Krause v. Peoria Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Four Freedoms House of Philadelphia, Inc. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Bader Realty & Invesment Co. v. St. Louis Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. American College of Surgeons v. KorzenIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API