Legal Opinion

State v. Hemdani

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 9, 2007No. S07A1560PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

Following the grant of habeas corpus relief to Ameer Hemdani, the State appeals, contending that the habeas court erred by finding that Hemdani’s guilty plea to one count of sexual battery and one count of simple battery were not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. We affirm.

In habeas proceedings, the State bears the burden of showing that a challenged guilty plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered. To satisfy this burden, the State may point to evidence on the record of the guilty plea hearing that the defendant was fully informed and cognizant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Nash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Goodman v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Byrd v. ShafferSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. LEJEUNE v. McLAUGHLINSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  2. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Mims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  4. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API