Bentley v. Aero Energy, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSTONE, Judge.
The question presented by tMs petition for review is whether the failure of the administrative law judge (ALJ) to render a decision within the 90-day time frame prescribed in 803 KAR 25:011 § 10(6)(a) renders that decision a nullity, entitling the claimant to a new hearing and decision within the required time limit. The Workers’ Compensation Board perceived no due process deprivation in the failure to adhere to the time requirements of the regulation and concluded that a new hearing was not warranted. We agree and affirm.
Claimant Ernest Bentley sought benefits for injuries…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Merle D. Vincent, Jr., Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Dale Verne Deremer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- In Re MullesteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Secretary, Labor Cabinet v. Boston Gear, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- McCurry v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Whittaker v. AllenKentucky Supreme Court · 1998