Parmelee v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case: ■The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff, Harold P. Parmelee, entered the Naval Academy on June 19, 1909; graduated June 6, 1913, and commissioned an ensign; served on the U. S. S. Maryland as signal officer and junior watch and division officer, and served as an instructor at the United States naval training station, Portsmouth, Ya.; served on the U. S. S. Louisiana as watch and division officer…
Read the full summary
The Reporter's statement of the case: ■The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff, Harold P. Parmelee, entered the Naval Academy on June 19, 1909; graduated June 6, 1913, and commissioned an ensign; served on the U. S. S. Maryland as signal officer and junior watch and division officer, and served as an instructor at the United States naval training station, Portsmouth, Ya.; served on the U. S. S. Louisiana as watch and division officer and assistant engineer officer, and on the U. S. S. Milwauhee as watch and division officer; on the U. S. S. Stewart as…
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
The item upon which judgment is rendered is, in the-opinion of the court, governed by the cases of Katzer, 52 C. Cls., 32, and Knowles, 52 C. Cls., 520. As to the other item-claimed, it appears that the plaintiff was informed that if he-did not desire to proceed to Norfolk, Va., at his own expense he should regard the orders as revoked and return them to the bureau for cancellation. This evidently was not an order such as was discussed in the Katzer case, supra, and does not. justify an extension of the rule therein stated.
Judgment will be entered for plaintiff in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Katzer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- Guilmette v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923