Legal Opinion

Katzer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 8, 1917No. 33169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The Reporter’s statement of the ease:

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

This is an action by a paymaster’s clerk for mileage.

The plaintiff was appointed paymaster’s clerk on August 9, 1913, by the Secretary of the Navy, whose order, addressed to plaintiff at Vallejo, Cal., was as follows:

“ 1. Having been nominated by Paymaster David Potter for duty as paymaster’s clerk on board the Minnesota, you are authorized to report to the commandant, navy yard, Mare Island, Cal., for the necessary physical examination as required by Article 3318, U. S. Navy Regulations, 1913.
“2. If found qualified, the examining officer will endorse such fact upon this order; you will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MouatSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Glavey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. United States v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Miller v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
  5. United States v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921
  2. Parmelee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921
  3. Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  4. Guilmette v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API