Legal Opinion

Phillips v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 19, 1993No. 91-3579PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant appeals from his conviction for robbery, asserting that (1) there was an improper joinder of offenses and defendants; (2) the evidence presented by the appellee was insufficient to prove that the appellant intended to commit robbery; and (3) the trial court erred in giving a flight instruction. We conclude that the improper joinder issue was not preserved. While the evidence of the appellant’s intent was far from overwhelming, we conclude that it was sufficient for submission of the issue to the jury. The trial court erred, however, in giving a flight instruction. See Fenelon v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Fenelon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Keys v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Kelvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. MacK v. SingletaryDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API