Legal Opinion

Kercheval v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1930No. 5700PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted on an indictment charging him and one Slentz with using the mails in furtherance of a scheme to defraud. Error is assigned to the overruling of a motion for a directed verdict, on the ground of- a fatal variance between the allegations of the indictment and the proof. '

The indictment substantially alleges a scheme by which appellant and his eodefendant were to sell shares and interests in certain designated oil and gas leases by false representation that they were of great present and prospective value and that the said defendants were the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Nash v. TowneSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Pope v. AllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. HickeySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. West v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Panella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  3. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  4. Republic Supply Co. v. Del Rey Oil & Refining Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API