Legal Opinion
Husky Marketing and Supply Company v. FERC
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 21, 2024No. 23-1042PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 12, 2024 Decided June 21, 2024 No. 23-1042 HUSKY MARKETING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS MPLX OZARK PIPE LINE LLC, INTERVENOR Consolidated with 23-1043 On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Gregory S. Wagner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Richard E. Powers, Jr. and Joseph R. Hicks. Scott Ray Ediger, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United Distribution Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Association of Oil Pipe Lines v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Kaneb Pipe Line Operating Partnership, L.P., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Xcel Energy Services Inc. v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Petro Star Inc. v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026