Legal Opinion

Grabenstatler v. Rock Asphalt & Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The employer was insured against claims under the Workmen’s Compensation Law under two separate policies written by two separate insurance companies. Apparently the employer intended to divide its general line of work into two distinct fields, separately insured. The proof shows that the work that was being done by claimant at the time of his injury was out of the general line of the employer’s work and not covered by the principal items of either policy. The work was, however, covered by an item inserted in each policy which covered “ Drivers and drivers’ helpers (if not included in 1)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Cheesman v. CheesmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Claim of Jaabeck v. Theodore A. Crane's Sons Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Matter of Skoczlois v. . VinocourNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilks v. Allstate Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Dunne v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Standard Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API