Legal Opinion
United States National Bank of Portland v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 2, 1959No. Civ. 8796PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (2).
On December 1, 1950, plaintiff entered into contract DA-45-164-eng-805 with the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, acting for the United States. The contract was for channel clearing and snagging, and for constructing a revetted levee. This work was to be done on the Touchet River, Washington.
This ease is in the nature of an appeal from the Corps of Engineers Claims and Appeals Board. That Board on July 8, 1954, refused plaintiff’s claim for: (1) $11,705.85 for additional excavation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lowell O. West Lumber Sales, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Mann Chemical Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
- Langoma Lumber Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Wagner Whirler & Derrick Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Langoma Lumber Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Hamden Co-Operative Creamery Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Allied Paint & Color Works, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Hamden Co-Operative Creamery Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- McKinnon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1959
- M. Berger Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.